ACTIVITY

Whale vs tree debate

Description: 
You will take on the role of either a whale or a tree (or any other species)and make the case that your organism is more valuable in nature. Especially in relation to climate and ecosystems. You’ll gather evidence, prepare arguments, and debate against the opposing side. In doing so, you’ll explore how both whales and trees contribute to climate regulation, carbon storage, nutrient cycles, and ecosystem services.

Trees are well known for capturing carbon dioxide and helping cool the planet, but whales also have surprising roles in the carbon cycle and ocean health. Through this activity, you’ll see how different parts of nature contribute in different ways, and how sometimes the “invisible” contributions matter a lot.

1
  • Hook and frame the question 5 min
    Write the motion on the board: “Whales or trees: which contributes more to climate regulation and ecosystem health?” Clarify that “value” includes carbon, biodiversity, and ecosystem services.

  • Assign roles 3 min
    Split the class into two teams. Each team picks quick roles: lead speaker, evidence finder, rebuttal lead, note-taker, timekeeper.

  • Give starter briefs 5 min
    Hand out a one-page fact sheet per side with 3 to 5 key points. Example prompts:

    • Whales: long lifespans and stored carbon, whale falls to deep sea, nutrient recycling that boosts phytoplankton.

    • Trees: photosynthesis and carbon storage in biomass and soils, habitat, water cycle regulation.

  • Research and evidence gathering 10–15 min
    Teams highlight their strongest points, find at least one limitation of their own case, and prepare one question for the other side. Encourage students to note sources where possible.

  • Plan arguments 7–10 min
    Use a simple structure:

    • Claim

    • Evidence and explanation

    • Anticipated counter-argument

    • Response

  • Debate round: openings 6 min
    Tree team opening 3 min, Whale team opening 3 min. Speakers present 2 to 3 strongest claims with evidence.

  • Cross-examination 6 min
    Each side asks the other side two questions. Keep questions concise and evidence-focused.

  • Rebuttals 6 min
    Each team delivers a 3-minute rebuttal addressing the opponent’s main points and reinforcing their strongest evidence.

  • Closings 4 min
    One minute per side to summarize the case and state why their evidence best answers the motion.

  • Class vote and debrief 8–12 min
    Silent individual vote. Then discuss: Which evidence felt most convincing, where was uncertainty, how might both whales and trees work together in climate solutions.

GreenComp:
You must be logged in to use this feature.
InvestigateAct
THEME:
Nature & biodiversity
TIME:
AGE: 10-12 years, 13-15 years

SUBJECTS:

  • Nature sciences
  • Social studies
  • Mother tongue
  • English

TOOLS / MATERIALS:

-

METHODS:

    RESOURCES: