METHOD

Ping-Pong Argumentation

The students compete by arguing either for or against a viewpoint. They present their own arguments and refute others’ arguments in a respectful manner.

The method trains students to think critically, formulate well-founded arguments, and strengthen their oral presentation skills.

BEFORE

Prepare, or have the students prepare, a series of issues, alternatives, or proposals that they will argue for or against.

Divide the class into two or more teams. Each team will either argue for or against something, or argue in favor of their own proposal.

1

Introduce the debate and the rules of the game, for example, whether interruptions are allowed or not, and how long or how many rounds the debate will last.

2

Give the teams time to prepare their arguments. Each team should note down their main arguments and any examples they plan to use.

3

One team starts by presenting their arguments (e.g., why train travel is better than flying). The other team listens actively and prepares a response/counter argument.

4

Team 2 responds to Team 1’s arguments by challenging them and presenting their own.

5

The debate continues until time is up or the agreed number of rounds is completed.

Didactic tips:

  • Start with a group brainstorm about what makes an argument strong. Use examples from politics or debate programs.
  • Let the students create their own statements to debate or battle about—e.g., “Mobile phones should be banned in school” or “Fast fashion should be taxed more heavily.”
  • Give the students time to practice argumentation techniques, such as using facts, examples, or emotions.
  • Optionally, hold a quick “lightning battle” where students take turns giving an argument in only 10 seconds.
  • Each team can be given 30 seconds to deliver a final argument aimed at convincing the audience or judges.
  • The class can then evaluate the arguments together: Which were the strongest? What made some arguments more convincing?
  • Optionally, let some students act as neutral judges who assess the strength of the arguments and provide reasoned evaluations. The judges can also vote using the Simple Majority Vote method to decide which arguments were most convincing.
Tags: Debating, developing arguments
You must be logged in to use this feature.
EngageInvestigate

MODES OF ORGANISATION:

  • Pair
  • Group
  • Whole class

TOOLS / MATERIALS:

  • Claims/Issues